iPhone outsold by the Blackberry Curve? – yeah but that’s not the important part

The blogs are buzzing with the news that for the first quarter the Blackberry Curve outsold the Apple iPhone according to NPD Research.

I read it first on Techmeme and clicked through to a number of posts on the subject. All of them citing the NPD research.

There is no doubt that the Blackberry is a mighty fine device but total units isn’t the important thing in my view. Few things to consider:

1 – The Blackberry Curve is available on every single carrier in the United States. Verizon (biggest US carrier) had a buy one-get one promotion. It would be an absolute shocker if the iPhone, available only on AT&T, exceeded the Curve

2 – The Blackberry App World is still lacking big time in my experience. Both in UX and apps. RIMM needs to get developer attention. That’s critical.

3 – iPhone 3.0 OS, which I’ve been using in beta, is going to hurt RIMM. Copy & paste, search and horizontal keyboard is a big improvement and will win over plenty of bberry users.

Decided to make my kids photos private by default

I’ve been publicly sharing photos online since 1999 when my first daughter was born.

I was so proud that I wanted the world to know when she first smiled, sat up, first started to crawl, talk, walk, ride a bike, etc. Same was true for my next two kids.

Ten years later and I have over 6k photos on Flickr. The vast majority of them are of my kids or family members. And with a couple of rare exceptions, the default setting is public mode.

But something changed lately for me. Maybe it was one extra person I didn’t know that decided to favorite my kid on Flickr. Or maybe I’m just getting more sensative. I really don’t know.

So this evening I changed the privacy settings on the kids photos on Flickr to private and only viewable to my family and close friends.

Some of my close friends won’t be able to see photos of my kids and that’s not the intention. So if you are a close friend and want access then please email me and I’ll send you a flickr invite to our online photos.

I’ll still occasionally post a public photo of the kids.

But, for now, the default mode for the kids is private.

Should cable operators pay less for content?

It’s no secret that cable operators pay billions of dollars to content owners.

NBC gets big bucks from Comcast, Time Warner et al for CNBC and their other cable properties. Even bigger fees goto the king of cable programming – ESPN. Those content owners get a dual revenue stream: subscription fees and ad dollars. That revenue stream from MSOs is what led to the famous line from NBC chief, Jeff Zucker, famous line about moving from analog dollars (cable) to digital pennies (web).

But the reality is that the MSO’s don’t pay those fees out of pocket. They pay a wholesale fee to the content owner. Then they package it up and resell it to the end user.

So in our modern day world where you can get fantastic online, the question is whether this analog model model makes sense anymore or in the near future.

I think great content will always be paid for. But who pays who?

I’ve been having this debate with several business associates for some time. At some point, MSOs won’t keep paying the escalating rates for programming.

Saul Hansell at the NYT highlights this issue in his last column. Here’s the punchline:

Over all, these companies are doing quite well, making more money than ever, with lower capital investment. But if there was one weak spot jumping out of the numbers, it was not their Internet business but their traditional TV service, where the cost of paying for content to put on all those channels is rising faster than subscription fees.


I get all of my financial news from the web. Seeking Alpha, Twitter, Covestor, google finance and the new york times. I get my sports content online as well thanks to the MLB.com, espn, twitter and blogs.

So at what point does Brian Roberts at Comcast tell NBC, “Hey, Jeff, I know you love those analog dollars. We do too. But we can’t pay you that much anymore. Our users are getting financial news elsewhere”.

I think it’s sooner than later.

In that case, content owners need to get there content everywhere and not limit it to a few select points of distribution.

Because the analog business model isn’t going to hold up forever.

(photo from flickr)

Having had the pleasure of being rejected by you and/or Spark three times, I can confirm you are one of the better VCs at saying no! The mere fact that I came back for a second and third time is an indication that you and Spark are in an elite class of professional investors who truly resonate with rather than pay lip service to entrepreneurs.

Stephen Randall, CEO at LocaModa in a comment to my post When a VC turns you down

thanks stephen. made my day.