Some thoughts about mobile from mexico

I arrived in Mexico yesterday and been thinking about a bunch of random mobile things.

In no particular order.

0 – our hotel is roughly an hour drive south of the cancun airport. I had 3g coverage the entire way down. I don’t think I’ve driven anywhere in MA, NY or CA for that long and had the same 3g coverage

1 – before I left I called AT&T and signed up for their international plan. $29 for 20megs of data plus $0.50/minute for voice. Going over on data will cost me a $5.12 per meg. Such a nasty way to bill. Keeping track of data usage like that is nuts.

2 – thankfully i don’t have to keep track of cellular data since the hotel has very good wifi.

3 – i downloaded the Skype app for iPhone and pay $3 per month for unlimited calling to the US. I don’t plan on making a lot of calls except for dialing into my partner mtg on Tuesday. If I didn’t have skype I’m not sure how much it would cost.

4 – sim cards feel closed and nasty. I feel like a sucker roaming on cellular. Wifi feels good.

5 – I brought our big digital slr, canon 40d. I’ve taken way more pics on my iPhone than the dslr. Wonder how much longer i will lug around a dedicated camera.

6 – read the nyt this morning before everyone woke up on my iPhone. I wouldve preferred an iPad.

That’s all for now. Back to vacation.

(please excuse any typos. Wrote this on my phone).

The Swiss Army Knife Mistake

When I was kid I remember getting a swiss army knife when I joined the cub scouts.

I loved that thing. It had a knife, compass, screwdriver, saw and even a toothpick. It had a bunch of other things too.

Since then so many products have tried to copy the swiss army knife model of “all-in-one”. The idea is to pack so much into your product that it solves everything and for everyone.

I think the only product that has done well with the swiss army knife model is the iPhone. Other than that more does not mean better. But the iPhone handles the swiss army knife challenge elegantly because the UI doesn’t get jenky as you add more apps (unlike your all in one toaster, all in one dvd, all in one receiver, all in one printer etc).

Right now, I use so many different web services for a variety of different things. I use blippy, twitter, tumblr, last.fm, skype, gdgt, gmail, foursquare, plancast, and a bunch of other services too.

But I don’t want them all smashed together. They are valuable to me because they solve different problems and offer me different experiences.

In the early days of Tumblr, some users were using it as a life streaming service. Auto-import every RSS feed you own and stick it in your tumblr blog. I tried that too. But that wasn’t the idea of that simple RSS feature and most folks don’t do that anymore (or at least the people I follow). Instead users have settled into a place where they curate what they want in their tumblr dashboard and what they don’t. It’s packaged with care and not autofed.

Similarly, I don’t want my Twitter timeline filled with every single auto-post from every other service. They should stand apart and offered their own user experience. My gdgt and foursquare and blippy timelines couldn’t be more different and that is a beautiful thing.

And that is my beef with Google Buzz. It is trying to be the swiss army knife of my social media life. And I don’t want that – it’s unnatural to me and mixes things that I don’t want mixed. I think the part that is most unnatural about Buzz is that the autostreams everything. Dan Lyons puts it nicely:

Why, Google? Why take a perfectly wonderful e-mail system and pollute it by adding a zillion new things to it? I’m not looking for more clutter in my life. I’m looking for less. At the launch event some Google exec claimed Buzz is a way to “find the signal in the social networking noise,” but to me it looks like Google is just adding to the noise.

I want to choose what goes in.

Auto post, auto subscribe, auto import and auto follow aren’t helpful to me.

One more thing, the swiss army mistake doesn’t meant that web services shouldn’t support a two way API. Products should talk to each other and the best ones do just that. But that is different than the magical, all singing/all dancing-all-in-one-uber-product-on-steriods trap". It’s actually the opposite.

Take control over your destiny

I’ve seen a number of consumer startups trying to reach massive scale by doing deals with carriers or device manufacturers (cell phone manufacturers)

Some worked out nicely for the startups but most don’t.

I like consumer startups that are taking charge of their own destiny. They are not white labeling their product or brand. They are not licensing intellectual property. They are not comprimising the user experience to make the big “partner” happy. They are not indifferent to those decisions.

Instead they are 100% focused on the user (and developers) and establishing their brand and purpose.

Awhile back I wrote about a problem I encountered when I ported my phone number. I asked for a better way to communicate this info to my friends, family and business associates. I received about a dozen emails from startups going after this problem. Unfortunately most of them built a product and approach that assumed that a deal with carriers was better if not essential.

I’d like to think that the open web and open mobile platforms allow us to finally go direct to our users and figure this stuff out together.

Now there are times where partnership and distribution deals make sense. I like them if they add value to the network and don’t hide the consumer brand or force the startup to make unnatural choices.

But in the absence of those things, I say damn the torpedoes and take control over your destiny. Don’t outsource it.

(clarification: this post is about consumer applications. i’m not talking about infrastructure or technology licensing companies, etc).