Thinking about simple inbox hacks

I took Thursday and Friday off this week and went away with lauren and the kids for an extended weekend. We are having a blast.

For the most part and except for a few unplanned work related things I’ve been off the grid.

Tonight, everyone was wiped out and went to bed early. I’m still wide awake.

I’m staring at my inbox getting back to the most important items (family, urgent portfolio company matters, my partners and very close friends).

But my inbox doesn’t care about me and it’s all there. And growing. And in no particular order. It only cares about the most recent stuff because that is what it “bubbles up to the top”.

Not nice.

Time of email receipt isn’t the most important thing for me right now.

At a glance my email inbox looks probably a lot like yours:

-tons of work emails

-personal emails

-calender invite emails

-blog comments (disqus)

-Twitter DMs

-social net messages (so & so wants to be your friend, social net messages)

-PhoneTag voicemail transcriptions

-ecommerce receipts & status

-spam

The list goes on.

I need a way to fix this and I’m not willing to declare email bankruptcy.

When I get back home I’m going to do some simple inbox improvements:

1. Create a separate email gmail account for my disqus comments. iPhone handles multiple email accounts beautifully.

2. Create a separate email account for phonetag. (is there a way to use iPhone visual voicemail and Phonetag at the same time? I think the answer is no on this one.)

3. Create a separate email account for ecommerce stuff.

4. re-configure twitter to send DMs to sms only

5. Right now my work and personal email goto the same place. wondering if that is a good idea or not.

6. since switching to gmail, spam has gotten lighter. but it’s still a problem.

7. can i filter gmail to show me only messages where I’m on the To: line (vs cc) ?

Please share any simple inbox tips. I’m sure I’m missing some obvious ones.

Maybe I’m tired too :)

Free Thoughts

(Disclaimer: the following post comes free of charge, so you get what you pay for :)

I just retweeted Bill Gurley’s blog post about “free” business models.

Bill brings up a number of excellent points. I liked this one the best:

The key question for anyone in business is, “Can someone do what you do for free?”.  If the answer is “yes” you have a problem.


This touches the big issue for me. Free is so interesting & powerful because it’s possible to create enormous value at a low cost.

Here’s a reasonable example:

CNBC vs Seeking Alpha.

It’s true, CNBC’s traffic is marginally higher than Seeking Alpha. Yet I’m quite sure the costs to run Seeking Alpha is substantially lower than CNBC.

With all due respect, I never check out CNBC on cable or online. I get my financial news from Seeking Alpha, blogs and Twitter.

What will this chart look like 1,2 & 5 years from now. I can’t predict but something tells me the open web will deliver the goods here vs closed world of broadcast television.

So, CNBC may lose analog dollars but digital dimes are important. They are the future.

We need to figure out how to build more successful digital dimes companies. We must realize that the train has the left the station for many businesses in the analog dollars business.

Why? Because it’s possible to compete with those businesses with a free model since the operational costs are significantly lower. And digital dimes companies can be great top line & great bottom line (google) as well as medium top line and great bottom line (craigslist).

Another example, your wireless phone company can’t charge $1.50 for directory assistance. It’s going to be free. Either from a startup or Google or the open web. The cost of human directory assistance and that “old” revenue model & profit is an endangered species.

Bill brings up another point. Not everything needs to go free. Bill cites HBO and the WSJ’s successful subscription models. Bill further suggests the NYT goes the same route. There are plenty of other successful online subscription examples such as MLB.TV, Netflix, WoW, Xbox Live, the list goes on.

We shouldn’t limit ourselves to a tired, old debate that there are only two choices of making money: ad supported (page views) vs subscription.

There are new, proven models that are generating real revenue and real profits in virtual goods & micropayments amongst others.

I like Bill’s post a lot. As he points out there isn’t one way to do this. It is not simply a black and white issue.

The color part brings huge opportunity.

We focus a lot on culture specifically at Twitter because of this spotlight, and of the fact that we don’t want to end up like the child actor who found success early and grew up all weird and freaky. We want to remain OK; just because we found success early and in many ways got lucky doesn’t mean we’re all a bunch of geniuses. It means what it means.

Understanding good data from the useless stuff

One of the best things about online services is the data. The amount of data can get massive quickly.

We all know that data is valuable for a variety of reasons.

But the thing I want to talk about is how that data can make your product better (vs data monetization).

Many web services do capture and record vast amounts of data. But a lot of that data isn’t very helpful. The key is identifying the important parts that can improve your service.

First, if you aren’t capturing that data then get busy and start. I recently met an entrepreneur who created a widely used Firefox extension. But he wasn’t keeping track of any data. He is now :)

Next, find out what data is important. Well, that’s the hard part.

Few examples to consider.

I recently spoke to an executive that ran a successful subscription based virtual word. He told me that as soon as users invested x hours into the product they were subscribers for life. The assignment in their case was pretty clear: focus on user engagement and the business model will compile. Other data was helpful but much less important than getting users to invest time in the game.

Another entrepreneur told me that in his social app, if a user connected with 5 friends then there was a high likelihood they would become highly active. They are working on improving their invite a friend component and friend discovery. Other features are taking a back seat for now.

Yet another entrepreneur told me that reducing the sign up process to a bare minimum, user name and password and nothing else, generated a 3x increase in sign ups. They did a lot of A/B testing of their home page & sign up experience.

In all of these companies the critical data components were different from one another.

A lot of this seems like common sense but it’s a challenge to figure out and prioritize. That’s especially true in a startup where you are chronically under funded and understaffed.

But I encourage you to make the investment & track down the good data and ignore the useless stuff.

(n.b. the entrepreneurs mentioned in this post are not in the Spark portfolio).

Foursquare

Charlie had one of those posts yesterday that created an “ah-ha” moment for me. He wrote about the value of Foursquare as being something more than a game.

Go read the full post here.

Fred was also inspired and he joined.

I did as well. Here’s my foursquare profile.

After I joined, Charlie tossed up this gem on twitter:

Uh-oh. I created a monster with my 4[] post (http://bit.ly/i3582) and now all these old dudes are friending me. Oh wait… it’s just @bijan

Still trying to get over that one.

In any case, I’m looking forward to diving into the Foursquare pool. The iphone app gives you control over what goes out over twitter and what doesn’t which is how I hoped it would work.

It’s going to come in handy for our upcoming vacation to Cape Cod next month. My good friend is going to the Cape a few weeks after us. He asked me for restaurant & beach recommendations. I just sent him a note telling him to join Foursquare and then he’s see all of my favorite spots along the outer cape. This friend isn’t into Facebook but he joined Foursquare a few minutes later.

That tells me something.

And as I mentioned in the comments on Fred’s post, if Tumblarity is any indication, I think we are going to see a bit of healthy competition between a few of my unnamed friends about Foursquare rank & status

Should be fun and helpful too.

“Walking speed absolutely reflects health status,” Simonsick says. So when you irritatedly blow past a trio of ambling visitors from Ohio or Iowa on the subway platform, you’re not just being an obnoxious New Yorker. You’re demonstrating that you’re going to outlive them—and enjoy better health while they slowly degrade.